Say Dark Knight, Gracie
So I've spent the better part of the last week holed up in a cabin
somewhere in the Rocky Mountains, without the Internet, about as far from Gotham as you can
get. The Movie was playing in town on the local one-screener, of
course, since we're still talking about planet Earth, but we skipped it
in favor of fly fishing and hiking from ski lifts to waterfalls.
Until today, that is, when we caught a plane to Seattle (and a smaller one from there to central WA) and, within a couple hours of dropping off our bags, hit the theater.
There's a lot to say about this latest incarnation of Gotham, including (as Cyrus pointed out earlier) its simultaneous invocation of Chicago and NYC, though I think a well-placed reference to the Bridge and Tunnel crowd tipped the balance in the latter's favor.
The above poster, in circulation at least since last April, should have signalled that this installment had Big Things to say about the Age of Terror. It's an image, though, that strikes a certain ambivalent note: the skyscraper's gash certainly aims to invoke the North Tower on 9/11; what to make of it, then, that the apparent sign of a terrorist strike comes in the shape of our hero? Is he standing in the foreground to confront the folks responsible, or is this his own doing?
The movie delivers in spades when it comes to wartime contextual references, though the ambivalence foreshadowed in the image above carries over enough to have provoked conflicting readings. Is Batman Bush, that is? And if so, how are we to feel about it? Or does the tagline about "a world without rules" align the current administration with the Joker instead? (I should have known I could count on EOTAW to come through when it came time for Bat-blogging: a more nuanced version of the latter argument holds that "The Joker isn't a stand-in for terrorists, then, but what clenched conservatives assume terrorists to be -- without plan, without complaint, without decency, without humanity.")
Students from Writing New York will recall where we stand when it comes
to aligning Batman's arch-enemies with our own gang of war criminals.
(Our AV for that lecture, which accompanies our reading of Miller's The Dark Knight Returns,
contains a more subtle rendition of the image to the left.) But they
will also recall the difficulties posed to Miller's influential
rendering of the Batman myth (which stands behind Nolan's films even
more than it did behind Burton's) by Miller's own ambivalence toward
New York, whose crime-ridden streets he fled for sunny LA in the early
'80s, prior to working on his Batman graphic novel. The context for
Miller's Dark Knight prominently included Bernie Goetz,
who gets name-checked in the novel. In other words, the best retellings
of the Batman story have to come to grips with the cowboy equation of
vigilante justice with Americanism.
To the degree the recent movie succeeds (and I think it might be the best Batman film yet), it does so because it doesn't let its hero off the hook, though I'm willing to concede that bad readers (that is, the nation that somehow elected both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for two terms -- well, not so much "elected" as acquiesced to the fiat in the second case) might miss even the less subtle points of the film's anti-war agenda.
UPDATE: A former WNY student emails us with a link to an article looking back at Batman's gay past ... which ties to another section of our lecture quite nicely. Thanks!
Until today, that is, when we caught a plane to Seattle (and a smaller one from there to central WA) and, within a couple hours of dropping off our bags, hit the theater.
There's a lot to say about this latest incarnation of Gotham, including (as Cyrus pointed out earlier) its simultaneous invocation of Chicago and NYC, though I think a well-placed reference to the Bridge and Tunnel crowd tipped the balance in the latter's favor.
The above poster, in circulation at least since last April, should have signalled that this installment had Big Things to say about the Age of Terror. It's an image, though, that strikes a certain ambivalent note: the skyscraper's gash certainly aims to invoke the North Tower on 9/11; what to make of it, then, that the apparent sign of a terrorist strike comes in the shape of our hero? Is he standing in the foreground to confront the folks responsible, or is this his own doing?
The movie delivers in spades when it comes to wartime contextual references, though the ambivalence foreshadowed in the image above carries over enough to have provoked conflicting readings. Is Batman Bush, that is? And if so, how are we to feel about it? Or does the tagline about "a world without rules" align the current administration with the Joker instead? (I should have known I could count on EOTAW to come through when it came time for Bat-blogging: a more nuanced version of the latter argument holds that "The Joker isn't a stand-in for terrorists, then, but what clenched conservatives assume terrorists to be -- without plan, without complaint, without decency, without humanity.")
Students from Writing New York will recall where we stand when it comes
to aligning Batman's arch-enemies with our own gang of war criminals.
(Our AV for that lecture, which accompanies our reading of Miller's The Dark Knight Returns,
contains a more subtle rendition of the image to the left.) But they
will also recall the difficulties posed to Miller's influential
rendering of the Batman myth (which stands behind Nolan's films even
more than it did behind Burton's) by Miller's own ambivalence toward
New York, whose crime-ridden streets he fled for sunny LA in the early
'80s, prior to working on his Batman graphic novel. The context for
Miller's Dark Knight prominently included Bernie Goetz,
who gets name-checked in the novel. In other words, the best retellings
of the Batman story have to come to grips with the cowboy equation of
vigilante justice with Americanism.
To the degree the recent movie succeeds (and I think it might be the best Batman film yet), it does so because it doesn't let its hero off the hook, though I'm willing to concede that bad readers (that is, the nation that somehow elected both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for two terms -- well, not so much "elected" as acquiesced to the fiat in the second case) might miss even the less subtle points of the film's anti-war agenda.
UPDATE: A former WNY student emails us with a link to an article looking back at Batman's gay past ... which ties to another section of our lecture quite nicely. Thanks!
Categories
Film , Writing New York0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Say Dark Knight, Gracie.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://ahistoryofnewyork.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/63
Leave a comment